Marcella Dessolis vs Mio Kijima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Sep at 08:40 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Dessolis vs M. Kijima

ITA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dessolis 2 - 0 Kijima
They have played 4 sets in total, with Marcella Dessolis winning 4 and Mio Kijima winning 0. The last match between Marcella Dessolis and Mio Kijima was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 13-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Marcella Dessolis getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dessolis | 2 |
| Kijima | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-13-25)
(Q3) W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(09-16-25)
M. Dessolis vs M. Kijima H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 43.00% (43-57) | Career Total W/L | 12.00% (3-22) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Dessolis vs M. Kijima Match Preview:
- How do Dessolis and Kijima compare in recent second serve performance? Dessolis has performed better, securing 32.76% of points on their second serve, compared to Kijima's 21.88%.
- What about their return game performance? Kijima has a slight edge on winning opponent's second serve points with 51.85% versus Dessolis's 50.18%, but Dessolis excels in first serve returns, capturing 36.49% of points compared to Kijima’s 20.93%.
- Dessolis has demonstrated stronger skill under pressure, saving 43.41% of breakpoints available, while Kijima has managed to save only 23.08%.
- Considering overall match performance in the past year, Dessolis has won 50% of their matches, far surpassing Kijima’s 9.09% win rate.
- On a Hard surface, Dessolis and Kijima differ significantly in career win percentages; Dessolis wins half of their matches, whereas Kijima has succeeded in merely 15%.
- When assessing performance at the $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF level, Dessolis shows competency, winning 53.33% of matches, compared to Kijima's 16.67%.
- The opponent quality faced by both in the past year is nearly identical, with Dessolis encountering players with an average rank of 162.7 and Kijima with 162.55.
- In deciding sets, Dessolis has a 20% success rate, while Kijima has won none, crucial for tight match predictions.
- What do break point conversion rates suggest? Dessolis has converted 43.68% of opportunities, outpacing Kijima who converts 25%.
Editorial Prediction (September 15, 2025, UTC):
Dessolis seems to show superior recent form, particularly when it comes to winning points on both serve and return and has considerable leverage in break point conversion, which suggests an advantage in pressure situations.
The data shows that Dessolis holds a significant edge in crucial matches and deciding sets, indicating a higher likelihood of sustaining performance under pressure.
Dessolis’s ability to tackle competitors with higher ranks, integrated with a relatively balanced history on preferred surfaces compared to Kijima, represents potential strength in this matchup.
Given these observations, Dessolis is predicted to emerge victorious in the upcoming clash against Kijima.
Marcella Dessolis vs Mio Kijima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Dessolis vs M. Kijima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 0:26:44 | Average Match Time | 0:26:44 |
| 38% (14/37) | 1st Serve % | 41% (16/39) |
| 86% (12/14) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (6/16) |
| 65% (15/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (6/23) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 69% (27/39) | Return Points Win % | 27% (10/37) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Dessolis Recent Matches Played
M. Kijima Recent Matches Played

M. Dessolis vs M. Kijima Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43.00% (43/57) | YTD Win/Loss | 12.00% (3/22) |
| 45.45% (100/120) | Sets Win/Loss | 12.00% (6/44) |
| 48.20% (977/1050) | Games Win/Loss | 25.95% (96/274) |
| 50.00% (12/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 15.38% (2/11) |
| 40.00% (28/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 10.00% (1/9) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 22 | Aces Total | 1 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 165 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 223.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 142 |
| 58% (1319/2283) | 1st Serve % | 47% (49/104) |
| 55% (725/1319) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (19/49) |
| 42% (403/964) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (13/55) |
| 51% (138/272) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 45% (979/2163) | Return Points Win % | 31% (33/107) |
| 34.21% (13/25) | Challenger W/L | 10.00% (1/9) |
| 48.39% (30/32) | Futures W/L | 13.33% (2/13) |
| 43% (42/98) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 12% (3/25) |
| 50% (5/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 32% (7/22) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 85% (48/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 15% (48/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (3/0) |
| 4% (52/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (22/0) |